Global markets have steadily been adding renewables such as wind and solar to their energy mix for several years now, but according to a handful of new reports, 2016 might have been the tipping point. Not only did the world add a record level of renewable energy capacity last year, but it did so at a significantly lower cost compared to 2015. In the U.S., wind and solar both had a knockout year, the latter of which ranked number one in terms of new capacity growth, ahead of fossil fuels.
Investors who might have overlooked this growing industry probably can’t afford to do so any longer. After several years of hype and false starts, renewable energy is finally starting to hit its stride.
Among our favorite energy stocks right now are SolarEdge Technologies, up more than 50 percent year-to-date as of May 24; Vestas Wind Systems, the largest wind farm manufacturer in the world, up 33 percent; Siemens Gamesa, up 27 percent; and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (SQM), one of the world’s top three lithium producers, up 26 percent. (Lithium is used to manufacture lithium-ion batteries.) We own these names, among other renewables, in our Global Resources Fund (PSPFX), which is currently overweight renewables. Note they are all outperforming the broader S&P 500 Energy Index, down 11 percent.
We find these companies attractive because their revenue is dependent not necessarily on new orders but on existing service agreements. It’s much like a car dealership. It may sell you a car at cost, but you must commit to allowing the dealer to service said car. This, of course, helps generate long-term revenue.
In the days following the November election, SolarEdge, Vestas and other “green” stocks contracted on fears that the incoming Donald Trump administration would heavily curtail the incentives for renewable capacity additions in the U.S. Ben Kallo, an analyst at Robert W. Baird, warned investors on November 9 that he expected “a significant overhang on solar stocks due to negative sentiment trades and oversupply in the industry.”
We saw the pullback as a prime buying opportunity, and we continued to accumulate renewables knowing that the underlying service portion of revenue is solid and stable. The bet was well-made. Our renewables allocation is now a core driver of PSPFX’s performance this year, as you can see here.
CBOETV - Dan Deming, KKM Financial, provides analysis on the volatility space as it maintains all-time lows.
The US Dollar Index (DX) continued a near-term bottoming pattern yesterday as it edged higher just off downchannel support (on the daily chart). Significantly, the DX is trying to bounce off the support of a downchannel (on the weekly chart) that began last December, along with the same chart's uptrend support line. As the weekly MACD still slopes firmly down, DX bulls will remain cautious for now. Nevertheless, any rally to the daily chart's downchannel resistance next week would be meaningful to day traders. I will look to enter long intraday in the green zone (of the daily chart), targeting the red zone by late next week.
US Dollar Index (ICE DX Jun17) Weekly/Daily/4hr/Hourly
Click here for today's technical analysis on Raw Sugar, Wheat
Tradable Patterns was launched to demonstrate that the patterns recurring in liquid futures and spot FX markets can be traded consistently profitably. Tradable Patterns’ daily newsletter provides technical analysis on a subset of three CME/ICE/Eurex futures (commodities, equity indices, and interest rates), spot FX and US equity markets, which it considers worth monitoring for the day/week for trend reversal or continuation. For less experienced traders, tutorials and workshops are offered online and throughout Southeast Asia.
This article is from Tradable Patterns and is being posted with Tradable Patterns’ permission. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and/or Tradable Patterns and IB is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the article. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
Just when Brazil’s economy seemed to be turning a corner, a new political scandal has caused a strong market reaction, sending Brazil’s stock market into a tailspin. President Michel Temer, who came into office following the impeachment of former President Dilma Rouseff due to a corruption scandal, is now caught up in a corruption scandal of his own.
If Temer is found not guilty, Brazil’s next general election takes place in 2018, so he would remain in office two more years and presumably continue to pursue his agenda. If he is found guilty, he would likely be impeached and removed from office, like Rouseff was.
While we have been encouraged by Temer’s more reform-minded government, in our view this latest scandal doesn’t mean that momentum will necessarily end—even if he’s removed from office.
If Temer were to be removed from office, we believe there will still be reforms, although they will likely take longer to implement. The bottom line is that the reform movement against corruption is ongoing, and that is overall positive for Brazil. Even if Temer himself may not be able to carry out the reforms he is now supervising, we think the reformists can move forward since they already have a momentum of their own. There is a realization that reform is needed in many areas, but it often takes time.
These developments emphasize the importance of taking a long-term view when investing in emerging markets. Change doesn’t happen overnight.
We think there are still plenty of opportunities on an individual-stock level in Brazil, and these types of market shocks can unlock values. We are currently seeing value in almost every sector in Brazil, simply because the market is depressed in all directions. Most interesting to us are the banking and retail sectors.
In terms of monetary policy in Brazil, in my view, there is still room for Brazil’s central bank to cut interest rates further. Its currency has seen a recovery from its lows hit on May 18 when the Temer scandal broke. More importantly, there has been a steady downturn in inflation. Brazil’s annual inflation rate stood at 3.77% in mid-May, its lowest level in 10 years.1
In my view, an aggressive cut in interest rates would be very good for the economy. I think it’s about time that Brazil had a reasonable interest-rate environment, particularly for small- and medium-sized businesses which could then get financing at lower rates. This could give an overall boost to the economy.
We will of course be monitoring the situation in Brazil to determine what type of impact this latest setback has on Brazil’s economy and the businesses operating there. In my view, the setback is temporary; we have seen other markets bounce back from political scandals in the past. The ongoing, longer-term recovery of Brazil’s stock market and economy still looks to us to be intact.
Mark Mobius’s comments, opinions and analyses are for informational purposes only and should not be considered individual investment advice or recommendations to invest in any security or to adopt any investment strategy. Because market and economic conditions are subject to rapid change, comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as of the date of the posting and may change without notice. The material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region, market, industry, investment or strategy.
All investments involve risks, including the possible loss of principal. Investments in foreign securities involve special risks including currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments. Investments in emerging markets, of which frontier markets are a subset, involve heightened risks related to the same factors, in addition to those associated with these markets' smaller size, lesser liquidity and lack of established legal, political, business and social frameworks to support securities markets. Because these frameworks are typically even less developed in frontier markets, as well as various factors including the increased potential for extreme price volatility, illiquidity, trade barriers and exchange controls, the risks associated with emerging markets are magnified in frontier markets. Stock prices fluctuate, sometimes rapidly and dramatically, due to factors affecting individual companies, particular industries or sectors, or general market conditions.
Many believe in the Fed/PPT's Omnipotence
The thickness of intellectual dishonesty amongst pundits and analysts in this stock market needs a power-saw to be cut through. And nothing presents this perspective more clearly than the certain belief in the power of central banks to prop up our market. In fact, this past week, we even heard from Asher Edelman, as quoted on ZeroHedge, that he has 'no doubt' that the Plunge Protection Team - of which the US Central Bank is a member - is behind the stock market's rally this year. But, this is no different than the exact same perspectives we read of many others who make the same claim about why the market is rallying well beyond anything they can understand.
First, the PPT was created to enhance "the integrity, efficiency, orderliness, and competitiveness of our Nation's financial markets and maintaining investor confidence." Moreover, it was only supposed to act when the market becomes "disorderly," in other words, when the markets drop strongly. Yet, many are so perplexed by this current market rally, which will likely take us well over 2500 in the S&P 500, that they are grasping at straws to understand why we have come up this high when they did not foresee it. So, they have clearly regressed to blaming their lack of understanding about the market on the Tooth Fairy . . .er . . . I mean Peter Pan . . .er . . . I mean the PPT/Fed.
Fed/PPT are powerless during market declines
But, as I will show you below, not only have these entities been completely powerless during those strong market declines they are supposed to prevent, they are absolutely not the buyers which have pushed this market to the current levels.
Yet, amazingly, these same people who are so certain regarding the omnipotence of the Central Bank somehow believe that the market is on the precipice of a major crash. How can that be? If they truly believed in their own rhetoric about the Central Bank, they would be mortgaging their houses to put their money on the same side of the market they believe the Central Bank represents - in other words, they would be long and strong the stock market. I mean, if they are so sure that the market is rallying because of the Central Bank, why would they not invest alongside such a sure thing?
However, as we know, that is simply not the case, as they are often the most vociferously bearish voices in the market, which substantiates their intellectual dishonesty. Ultimately, this tells us that not even they believe their own rhetoric. And that is why all these people who talk out of both sides of their mouth should be summarily ignored.
But, I am about facts rather than beliefs, so let's move to the facts.
While I will not even begin to discuss the failure of almost two decades of QE in Japan, this may be the poster child for the inability of a central bank to prevent major market declines. Many others have already discussed this at length, so I will not re-invent the wheel.
My focus is going to be upon the belief that the US Central Bank stands at the ready to prop up our financial markets at a moment's notice or the common belief in its ability to crush the US Dollar. We will try to identify whether they are truly in control, or if it is merely an illusion due to the stock market simply being in a bull market on its own. Moreover, I will also present the failure of the Chinese Central Bank to effectuate the same.
Since 2009, we have been in a strong bull market in US equities. This bull market began after the US market completed an almost decade long sideways consolidation. So, has anyone even considered that QE simply coincided with the ultimate resumption of a 90 year larger degree bull market which began after the Great Depression? I believe so. Yet, most who believe QE caused this rally are beholden to the logical fallacy that correlation equates to causation. But, the last time I looked, QE has ended, yet the market has continued to rise.
Those who believe in the omnipotence of the Central Bank believe they stand ready to prevent market crashes. Not only was this proven to be untrue back in 2008-2009, we cannot even say it is true even during this bull market we have been experiencing since that time.
The advent of the "plunge protection team" back in 1987 was supposed to prevent disorderly market declines, like that experienced in 1987. So, let's take a look at just how well the PPT/Central Bank has done to bring "order" to the stock market since that time.
Since 1987, I don't think that anyone can fool themselves into believing that we have not experienced periods of significant volatility, despite the PPT/Central Bank being "on the job." In fact, the following instances are just some of the highlights of volatility since the supposed inception of the Plunge Protection Team:
•February of 2001: Equity markets declined of 22% within seven weeks;
•September of 2001: Equity markets declined 17% within three weeks;
•July of 2002: Equity markets declined 22% within three weeks;
•September of 2008: Equity markets declined 12% within one week;
•October of 2008: Equity markets declined 30% within two weeks;
•November of 2008: Equity markets declined 25% within three weeks;
•February of 2008: Equity markets declined 23% within three weeks.
•May of 2010: Equity markets experienced a "Flash Crash." Specifically, the market started out the day down over 30 points in the S&P500 and proceeded to lose another 70 points within minutes. That is a loss of 9% in one day, but the market did manage to close down only 3.1% in one day!
•July of 2011: Equity markets declined 18% within two weeks
•August 2015: Equity markets decline 11% within one week
•January 2016: Equity markets decline 13% within three weeks
Based upon these facts, you can even argue that significant stock market "plunges" have become more common events since the advent of the Plunge Protection Team, especially since we have experienced more significant "plunges" within the 20 years after the supposed creation of the "Team" than in the 20 year period before.
Fed/PPT are powerless in FOREX world too
And, the Central Banks have not fared any better in attempting to control the FOREX world.
Back in July 2011, I was expecting a multi-year 3rd wave rally to take hold from the low 70's in the DXY with an ideal target of 103.53.
Now, I want to remind you again that when I made this call back in July of 2011, the DXY hit a low of 73.42. So, that meant I was expecting a 41% rally in the DXY. And, in the FOREX world, that is a massive move.
Moreover, I also want to remind you that I maintained this expectation when the Fed was throwing their QE bazookas at the market. For this reason, almost all market participants at the time were quite certain that the dollar was going to crash. So, most viewed my call for a multi-year rally in the dollar as ridiculous, and that is putting it mildly.
So, even with all that QE being thrown at the dollar, we still saw the massive rally in the DXY that I was expecting. Yes, this was certainly counter-intuitive to common market expectations. But, this was a clear case study in the fact that the fundamentals or the Fed did not control this market, while market sentiment was the clear driver of price, as our analysis of market sentiment kept us on the correct side of what was an "unexpected" market rally.
Moreover, as the Fed began rate hikes, many were certain that it will be a catalyst for the dollar to rally strongly. However, I was looking for the dollar to enter into a multi-year pullback once we struck our long-term target. Now, despite the Fed raising rates, once the market slightly exceeded our long term target (the high struck in the DXY was 103.82, whereas our target from 2011 was 103.53), the DXY has been pulling back as we have expected. Yet, most who believe that the Fed controls this market seem to be in disbelief, as the DXY "should" be rallying when the Fed is tightening. But, the Fed is simply showing it lacks control of this market just as it does the equity market.
The same has happened with the Chinese Yuan. Recently, China spent 1 trillion US Dollars (a quarter of their FX reserves) over the past 3 years in an attempt to prop up the Yuan. However, the Yuan still lost close to 14% of its value against the USD over this time period.
Moreover, our lead analyst of our Forex Service at Elliottwavetrader.net, Michael Golembesky, appropriately advised a short in this market despite the Chinese "intervention." In fact, Mike and I wrote several public articles on this potential trade. And, as you know based upon the downside price direction, he has been quite successful in that trade, even though most others in the market would not consider such a trade in the face of the unprecedented action by the Chinese government.
Ultimately, when truly tested, as in the situations above, the markets have moved completely opposite the "manipulation" attempts by the central banks. They have proven themselves powerless in the face of market forces. Ultimately, the market will do what the market will do despite the actions of the Central Banks. Believing otherwise is ignoring the truth in the market as presented by history and price action, and replacing it with the logical fallacy that correlation equates to causation. But, I can assure you that those that maintain these fallacious beliefs will feel significant financial pain when the next crash does occur and the Fed will be powerless to stop it.
See the chart illustrating the wave count on the U.S. Dollar (DXY) at https://www.elliottwavetrader.net/scharts/Chart-on-U-S-Dollar-DXY-201705261589.html .
We appreciate your feedback. If you have any questions or comments about IB Traders' Insight please contact email@example.com.
The material (including articles and commentary) provided on IB Traders' Insight is offered for informational purposes only. The posted material is NOT a recommendation by Interactive Brokers (IB) that you or your clients should contract for the services of or invest with any of the independent advisors or hedge funds or others who may post on IB Traders' Insight or invest with any advisors or hedge funds. The advisors, hedge funds and other analysts who may post on IB Traders' Insight are independent of IB and IB does not make any representations or warranties concerning the past or future performance of these advisors, hedge funds and others or the accuracy of the information they provide. Interactive Brokers does not conduct a "suitability review" to make sure the trading of any advisor or hedge fund or other party is suitable for you.
Securities or other financial instruments mentioned in the material posted are not suitable for all investors. The material posted does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situations or needs and is not intended as a recommendation to you of any particular securities, financial instruments or strategies. Before making any investment or trade, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Any information provided by third parties has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable and accurate; however, IB does not warrant its accuracy and assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions.
Any information posted by employees of IB or an affiliated company is based upon information that is believed to be reliable. However, neither IB nor its affiliates warrant its completeness, accuracy or adequacy. IB does not make any representations or warranties concerning the past or future performance of any financial instrument. By posting material on IB Traders' Insight, IB is not representing that any particular financial instrument or trading strategy is appropriate for you.